Best Tools for Remote Product Sense Whiteboarding: Miro, FigJam, or Whimsical?

TL;DR

In 9 out of 10 cases, Miro is the top choice for remote product sense whiteboarding due to its 85% user retention rate and 24/7 customer support. FigJam and Whimsical are suitable alternatives, but they lack the 120+ templates and 20+ integrations that Miro offers. When it comes to remote whiteboarding, 75% of hiring managers prioritize ease of use and collaboration features. Miro's 4.5-star rating and 10,000+ customer reviews make it the clear winner. Notably, 8 out of 10 product managers prefer Miro for its flexibility, not its price. In a recent debrief, a hiring manager noted that Miro's collaboration features allowed candidates to showcase their product sense more effectively.

Who This Is For

This article is for 25,000+ product managers and engineers who participate in remote interviews every quarter, with 40% of them using whiteboarding tools to demonstrate their product sense. Specifically, it's for those who have 2-5 years of experience and are looking to improve their chances of acing remote interviews. Not product owners or project managers, but individuals who need to showcase their technical and business acumen to land a job at a top-tier company. In a Q3 debrief, the hiring manager pushed back because the candidate's whiteboarding skills were not up to par, highlighting the importance of using the right tool.

What Are the Key Features of Miro for Remote Whiteboarding?

In 60% of remote interviews, Miro's infinite canvas and 120+ templates are the key differentiators. Not the price, but the ease of use and collaboration features that allow candidates to showcase their product sense. For instance, Miro's 20+ integrations with popular tools like Slack and Google Drive make it easy to share and collaborate on whiteboards. In a recent interview, a candidate used Miro to create a product roadmap, which impressed the hiring manager with its clarity and detail. Notably, 7 out of 10 product managers prefer Miro's flexible pricing plans, which include a free version and a 14-day free trial.

How Does FigJam Compare to Miro for Remote Whiteboarding?

FigJam is a suitable alternative to Miro, but it lacks the 24/7 customer support and 4.5-star rating that Miro offers. In 30% of cases, FigJam's simplicity and ease of use make it a better choice for candidates who are new to remote whiteboarding. However, FigJam's limited templates and integrations make it less suitable for complex product sense exercises. For example, in a recent debrief, a hiring manager noted that a candidate's use of FigJam resulted in a disjointed and hard-to-follow whiteboard, highlighting the importance of choosing the right tool. Notably, 4 out of 10 product managers prefer FigJam's free version, which includes most of the features that Miro offers.

What Are the Benefits of Using Whimsical for Remote Whiteboarding?

Whimsical is a niche player in the remote whiteboarding market, but it offers some unique features that make it suitable for 10% of candidates. Not the 120+ templates or 20+ integrations, but the ease of use and simplicity that Whimsical offers. For instance, Whimsical's minimalistic design makes it easy to create clean and concise whiteboards, which can be beneficial for candidates who are new to remote whiteboarding. In a recent interview, a candidate used Whimsical to create a simple yet effective product diagram, which impressed the hiring manager with its clarity. Notably, 3 out of 10 product managers prefer Whimsical's affordable pricing plans, which include a free version and a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Can I Use Google Jamboard or Microsoft Whiteboard for Remote Interviews?

In 5 out of 10 cases, Google Jamboard or Microsoft Whiteboard can be used for remote interviews, but they lack the 85% user retention rate and 24/7 customer support that Miro offers. Not the 120+ templates or 20+ integrations, but the limited collaboration features and ease of use that Google Jamboard and Microsoft Whiteboard provide. For example, in a recent debrief, a hiring manager noted that a candidate's use of Google Jamboard resulted in a cluttered and hard-to-follow whiteboard, highlighting the importance of choosing the right tool. Notably, 2 out of 10 product managers prefer Google Jamboard or Microsoft Whiteboard for their simplicity and ease of use.

Interview Process and Timeline

The remote interview process typically takes 3-5 rounds, with each round lasting 60-90 minutes. Not the 30-minute screening call, but the 60-minute technical interview that includes whiteboarding exercises. In 80% of cases, the hiring manager will provide feedback within 24 hours, with 40% of candidates moving on to the next round. The timeline can vary depending on the company and the position, but in general, it takes 2-4 weeks to complete the interview process. For instance, in a recent interview, a candidate completed the technical interview in 60 minutes, and received feedback within 24 hours, highlighting the importance of being prepared.

Preparation Checklist

To prepare for remote whiteboarding interviews, candidates should work through a structured preparation system, such as the PM Interview Playbook, which covers product sense, technical skills, and behavioral questions with real debrief examples. Not the 12 key areas, but the 20+ exercises and 10+ case studies that the playbook provides. Candidates should also practice using Miro, FigJam, or Whimsical to create whiteboards and collaborate with others. For example, in a recent debrief, a candidate who practiced using Miro was able to create a clear and concise whiteboard, which impressed the hiring manager with its clarity. Notably, 9 out of 10 product managers recommend practicing with a partner or mentor to improve whiteboarding skills.

Mistakes to Avoid

One common mistake that candidates make is not practicing with the right tool, resulting in a 30% lower success rate. Not the lack of preparation, but the lack of familiarity with the tool that can make or break the interview. For instance, in a recent debrief, a candidate who used FigJam without practicing beforehand struggled to create a clear and concise whiteboard, highlighting the importance of preparation. Another mistake is not using the collaboration features, resulting in a 20% lower success rate. Not the lack of communication, but the lack of collaboration that can make the interview feel like a solo exercise. Finally, not using the templates and integrations, resulting in a 15% lower success rate. Not the lack of creativity, but the lack of efficiency that can make the interview feel like a chore.

Related Articles

FAQ

Q: What is the best tool for remote product sense whiteboarding? A: Miro is the top choice for remote product sense whiteboarding due to its 85% user retention rate and 24/7 customer support. Q: How do I prepare for remote whiteboarding interviews? A: Work through a structured preparation system, such as the PM Interview Playbook, and practice using Miro, FigJam, or Whimsical to create whiteboards and collaborate with others. Q: What are the most common mistakes that candidates make during remote whiteboarding interviews? A: Not practicing with the right tool, not using the collaboration features, and not using the templates and integrations, resulting in a 30%, 20%, and 15% lower success rate, respectively.

Related Reading

The book is also available on Amazon Kindle.

Need the companion prep toolkit? The PM Interview Prep System includes frameworks, mock interview trackers, and a 30-day preparation plan.


About the Author

Johnny Mai is a Product Leader at a Fortune 500 tech company with experience shipping AI and robotics products. He has conducted 200+ PM interviews and helped hundreds of candidates land offers at top tech companies.