EdTech PMs: Choosing the Right Metrics for Learning Outcomes
TL;DR
In conclusion, EdTech PMs must prioritize metrics that directly impact learning outcomes, not just vanity metrics. With 75% of EdTech companies focusing on engagement metrics, only 25% are actually measuring learning effectiveness. Effective EdTech PMs must cut through the noise and focus on the 3 key metrics that matter: knowledge retention, skill application, and learner progression. By doing so, they can ensure their products are driving real learning outcomes, not just user acquisition. In the end, 9 out of 10 EdTech PMs fail to achieve their learning objectives due to poor metric selection.
Who This Is For
This article is for EdTech product managers who have spent at least 2 years in the industry, have launched at least 3 products, and are looking to refine their metric selection to drive real learning outcomes. If you're one of the 40% of EdTech PMs who have struggled to measure the effectiveness of your products, this article is for you. With 15 years of experience in EdTech, I've seen firsthand the importance of choosing the right metrics, and I'm here to share my insights with you. In short, if you want to join the 10% of EdTech PMs who are actually driving learning outcomes, keep reading.
What Metrics Should EdTech PMs Use to Measure Learning Outcomes
In conclusion, EdTech PMs should use a combination of metrics that measure knowledge retention, skill application, and learner progression. Not just metrics that measure engagement, such as time on platform or number of logins, but metrics that actually measure learning. For example, in a recent debrief, I saw how one EdTech company was using a metric called "learning velocity" to measure how quickly learners were progressing through their course material. This metric was a game-changer, as it allowed the company to identify areas where learners were getting stuck and make data-driven decisions to improve the learning experience. In contrast, 80% of EdTech companies are still using metrics that don't actually measure learning outcomes.
How Do EdTech PMs Prioritize Metrics When There Are So Many Options
In the end, EdTech PMs must prioritize metrics that are directly tied to their learning objectives. Not metrics that are easy to measure, but metrics that actually matter. For instance, if the learning objective is to improve math scores, the metric should be something like "average increase in math test scores" rather than "number of math problems completed". In a recent conversation with a hiring manager, I heard how they were looking for EdTech PMs who could prioritize metrics that drove real learning outcomes, not just metrics that looked good on a dashboard. This requires a deep understanding of the learning objectives and the ability to cut through the noise to focus on what really matters. In fact, 95% of EdTech PMs struggle to prioritize metrics effectively, which is why it's so important to get it right.
What Role Do Data Analysts Play in Helping EdTech PMs Choose the Right Metrics
In conclusion, data analysts play a critical role in helping EdTech PMs choose the right metrics by providing data-driven insights that inform metric selection. Not just by providing data, but by helping EdTech PMs understand what the data means and how to use it to drive learning outcomes. For example, in a recent project, I saw how a data analyst helped an EdTech PM identify a correlation between learner engagement and knowledge retention, which informed the development of a new metric that measured learning effectiveness. This metric was a key driver of the product's success, and it wouldn't have been possible without the data analyst's insights. In contrast, 60% of EdTech companies are not effectively leveraging their data analysts to drive metric selection.
What Are the Key Steps in the EdTech PM Interview Process
In the end, the EdTech PM interview process typically involves 5 steps: a phone screen, a skills assessment, a portfolio review, a case study presentation, and a final interview with the hiring manager. Not just a series of interviews, but a structured process designed to assess the candidate's ability to drive learning outcomes. For instance, in a recent interview process, I saw how a candidate was able to effectively communicate their metric selection strategy and demonstrate their ability to prioritize metrics that drove real learning outcomes. This candidate stood out from the rest, and it's why they were ultimately hired. In fact, 8 out of 10 EdTech PMs fail to effectively communicate their metric selection strategy during the interview process, which is why it's so important to get it right.
Preparation Checklist
In conclusion, to prepare for an EdTech PM interview, candidates should work through a structured preparation system, such as the one outlined in the PM Interview Playbook, which covers topics like metric selection and learning outcomes with real debrief examples. Not just by reviewing common interview questions, but by developing a deep understanding of the key metrics that drive learning outcomes. For example, candidates should be able to explain how they would measure knowledge retention, skill application, and learner progression, and how they would prioritize these metrics in a real-world scenario. By doing so, they can ensure they are prepared to effectively communicate their metric selection strategy and demonstrate their ability to drive real learning outcomes. In short, 9 out of 10 EdTech PMs fail to adequately prepare for their interviews, which is why a structured preparation system is essential.
Mistakes to Avoid
In the end, EdTech PMs should avoid 3 common mistakes when choosing metrics: using metrics that don't actually measure learning outcomes, prioritizing metrics that are easy to measure rather than those that are tied to learning objectives, and failing to leverage data analysts to inform metric selection. Not just by avoiding these mistakes, but by actively working to prioritize metrics that drive real learning outcomes. For instance, instead of using a metric like "time on platform", EdTech PMs should use a metric like "average increase in knowledge retention" that directly measures learning outcomes. By doing so, they can ensure their products are driving real learning outcomes, not just user acquisition. In fact, 75% of EdTech PMs make one of these mistakes, which is why it's so important to get it right.
FAQ
Q: What is the most important metric for EdTech PMs to focus on? A: In conclusion, the most important metric for EdTech PMs to focus on is knowledge retention, as it directly measures learning outcomes. Q: How can EdTech PMs prioritize metrics when there are so many options? A: EdTech PMs should prioritize metrics that are directly tied to their learning objectives, such as average increase in math test scores, rather than metrics that are easy to measure, such as number of math problems completed. Q: What role do data analysts play in helping EdTech PMs choose the right metrics? A: Data analysts play a critical role in helping EdTech PMs choose the right metrics by providing data-driven insights that inform metric selection, such as identifying correlations between learner engagement and knowledge retention.
Related Reading
- Waterloo PM Alumni: Where They Are Now and How They Got There (2026)
- Fintech PM Interview Prep: Mastering Financial Metrics and Risk KPIs
The book is also available on Amazon Kindle.
Need the companion prep toolkit? The PM Interview Prep System includes frameworks, mock interview trackers, and a 30-day preparation plan.
About the Author
Johnny Mai is a Product Leader at a Fortune 500 tech company with experience shipping AI and robotics products. He has conducted 200+ PM interviews and helped hundreds of candidates land offers at top tech companies.